• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • Battery Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • Transformers
  • Applications
    • LED Lighting
    • Rack Mount
    • Wireless
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • EE Learning Center
  • Video
    • EE Videos
    • TI Power Videos
    • Teardown Videos
  • Resources
    • Design Fast
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • FAQ
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • White Papers

Large electric vehicles responsible for as much
greenhouse gas as some conventional cars

June 9, 2016 By Lee Teschler Leave a Comment

At least for now, some electric vehicles (EVs) may generate about as much greenhouse gas (GHG) as some internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) when judged over their entire cradle-to-grave life.

So say researchers from Norway’s Industrial Ecology Programme and Dept. of Energy and Process Engineering, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Writing in the journal Environmental Research Letters, the group assessed the lifecycle GHG emissions of four differently sized EVs. They totaled up not just the GHG emitted to keep the cars on the road, but also that going into their manufacture and end-of-life phases.

From a GHG perspective, EVs equipped with smaller battery packs are more competitive than the heavier EVs with larger battery packs, the group says. However, EVs with small battery packs suffer from shorter driving ranges and depend more heavily on infrastructure in the form of fast charging stations.

GHG results
The left side displays emissions cumulative with production, use, and end-of-life (EOL) treatment. The grey shaded area indicates the lifecycle GHG emission of the conventional vehicles (segments A, C, D, and F are indicated on the right of the fossil envelope). The EV results are blue. In the column on the right, the emissions are broken down with battery production, vehicle production, use, and EOL treatment.

The group also says that compared to conventional vehicles, the EV production phase was environmentally more intensive. Yet, depending on the energy source used for charging, the EVs were able to make up for the higher production impact in the use phase.

To make their analysis, the group calculated the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions per vehicle and over a total driving range of 180,000 km using the average European electricity mix. They considered EVs that used lithium-ion batteries and which were manufactured in Europe (primarily Germany).

For the EV use-phase, the group says they made two key assumptions: lifetime and electricity mix. Industry reports most commonly give EVs a use life of 150,000 km. The researchers assumed a lifetime of 12 years and a yearly mileage of 15,000 km, resulting in a total mileage of 180,000 km. The total mileage and the EV energy requirement were multiplied to find total EV electricity requirement. Researchers assumed the average European electricity mix (521 g CO2/kWh) for the use phase. In addition, sensitivity analysis assessed electricity mixes with different carbon intensities.

The group points out that EV technology is still developing, and there are both near- and long-term opportunities to reduce their lifecycle GHG emissions. Near-term opportunities are mainly available through technology and production improvements. They consider impact reductions due to cleaner electricity more of a long-term opportunity.

The group also found that larger EVs can have higher lifecycle GHG emissions than smaller conventional vehicles. Thus, at the current state of the technology, finding the right balance between battery size and charging infrastructure is an important element in maximizing the climate change mitigation of EVs, they say.

 

Filed Under: Battery Tagged With: electric vehicle

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

DesignFast

Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

Subscribe to our Newsletter

The Power Electronic eNewsletter delivers breaking electronic and power component news, resources, product innovations and more.

Subscribe today

Test & Measurement Handbook


EE TRAINING CENTER CLASSROOMS

EE Classrooms

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Hotplugging UART
  • Can I use 5000uF 50V instead of 4700uF 50V in Inverter 700VA output rating board ?
  • Control panel 3 phase sequence indicators
  • Diagnosing a fault on a 18volt lithium Ion charger
  • Buck Regulator (5V, how to select, automotive application)

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • ASM - Enhanced 16F and long calls - how?
  • Passthrough charging-simple but impossible to achieve?
  • I need a music/LED fasher IC (only die)
  • I need a PROM CPU
  • software PWM

Follow us on Twitter

Tweets by PowerElectrTips

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • DesignFast
  • EE World Online
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • Connector Tips
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire and Cable Tips
  • 5G Technology World

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookFollow us on YouTube Follow us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy