• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • Battery Management
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Transformers
    • Transistors
  • Applications
    • 5G
    • AI
    • Automotive
    • EV Engineering
    • LED Lighting
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Wireless
  • Learn
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQ
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars & Digital Events
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • White Papers
    • Design Fast
  • Video
    • EE Videos & Interviews
    • Teardown Videos
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • Engineeering Training Days
  • Newsetter Subscription

Power factor and Power Factor Correction, Pt 2

August 7, 2017 By Bill Schweber

Part 1 of this FAQ discussed power factor and the issues associated with power factors which are not unity, and briefly mentioned power factor correction (PFC). This FAQ explores PFC in more detail.

Q: What is PFC?

A: PFC is an adjustment of a load’s front-end “appearance” so it presents a resistive-like load to the source, thus resulting in a PF closer to unity. How close to unity it needs to be is a function of the PFC design and the desired objective, as governed by regulatory mandates.

Q: What is driving the need for PFC?

A: In addition to saving power, as a non-unity PF represents wasted power to some degree, PFC is needed to reduce the harmonics generated by an AC line by loads with non-unity PF. The further from one and closer to zero that the PF is, the worse these harmonics and line distortion will be.

Q: What are some of the regulatory mandates?

A: Due to the concern about the power waste and effects of harmonic generation that result from non-unity PFs, various regulatory standards have been established which define the allowable PF for different power levels and devices. The most important such standard is IEC-61000-3-2, “Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current ≤16 A per phase)”.

This standard divides the loads into four classes (A, B, C, D) covering a diverse range of products including home appliances, home lighting, power tools, welding equipment, and much more, and at various power levels. This 2004 standard not only called out limits but also set up a schedule for tightening those limits over the succeeding years.

Q: What is the difference between PFC and harmonic reduction?

A: A specific harmonic-distortion pattern and harmonic values do not correspond directly to a given PF value, as different load-circuit inputs may produce different harmonic patterns yet have the same PF, and vice versa. The controlling standard IEC-61000-3-2 actually defines maximum levels of these harmonics out to the 40th harmonic of the AC-line frequency, Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Fig 2: The frequency spectrum shows the harmonic components of the waveform of Figure 1 out to the 40th harmonic; the regulatory PFC standard places a great deal of emphasis on minimizing these harmonics. (Source: ON Semiconductor)
Fig 1: This is a typical waveform at the input of a switching power supply, with significant distortion despite the minimal phase difference between current and voltage. (Source: ON Semiconductor)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q: Where is the PFC function physically implemented?

A: Before PFC became a major design and regulatory issue, it was generally installed at the power substation or the local site. For example, a factory with many motors in fixed locations might have a switchgear room with PFC-related components, usually capacitors which where shunted in line with the loads (motors). The capacitor array could be fixed or adjustable depending how many motors and their power ratings.

Since the new regulations focus on the individual end-product loads, such as switching-power supplies in home computers or video screens, the PFC is instead implemented within the end-product itself. This adds somewhat to the cost, but makes the PFC independent of where the unit is used, and does not limit the flexibility of moving it to another location.

Q: How can PFC be implemented?

A: There are two basic ways to provide PFC and harmonic reduction. The older method is the passive approach, using relatively large capacitors or inductors at the load to push the power factor towards unity and compensate for the unacceptable value. In contrast, the active approach uses an application- specific PFC IC, plus a few associated components such as small passives and MOSFETs, to shape the input current to match the input voltage waveform phase, Figure 3.

Fig 3: In an active-PFC correction approach, an application-specific IC and its support components are placed between the AC/DC rectifier bridge (or other rectifier) acting as a “pre-converter” and the bulk of the converter circuitry. (Source: ON Semiconductor)

Q: What are the passive versus active PFC tradeoffs?

A: As in most engineering situations, there is no single answer that is always correct, as it depends on cost, space, weight, performance required, and, of course, power level, Figure 4. In general, the passive approach is challenging to implement at higher-power levels as the required components get larger and costlier. Another potential disadvantage of passive PFC is that it must be designed for a specific line voltage (115 vs 230 VAC) and so the same set of passive components cannot be used in a worldwide design. However, there are cases where a one or a few passive components can solve the problem in a cost and design-effective way, as when a single large inductor can reduce the peaks of the current sufficiently and spread the current peaks out well enough to meet the regulations.

Fig 4: Comparison of the harmonic spectrum for a representative 250-W switching converter versus the IEC standard without PFC, with passive PFC, and with active PFC shows that the passive method here just barely meets the requirements are harmonic #3. (Source: ON Semiconductor)

Note that the passive approach is inherently “static” and cannot adapt to load changes or meet ever-more stringent PFC mandates. Increasingly, the dominant trend has been to use the active approach, and tailor it to the specific needs of the end product, A properly designed active circuit (the IC and support components) can bring PF close to unity, while the cost of this approach has dramatically dropped due to highly integrated ICs and the high product volumes that are a consequence of the regulatory mandates. Further, vendors of these active PFC ICs almost always provide validated reference designs which greatly ease the design-in challenge that initially slowed down the adoption of the active approach.

References

  1. http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/HBD853-D.PDF
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_61000-3-2
  3. http://www.powerelectronics.com/power-management/power-factor-correction-justified-home
  4. http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/hv/pfc.htm

You may also like:


  • Power factor correction topologies

  • Flybacks, forwards, active clamps, PoE, and USB PD

  • Magnetics for Power over Ethernet

  • Increasing power conversion efficiency with new semiconductor technologies

  • Power factor and Power Factor Correction, Pt 1

Filed Under: FAQ, Featured Tagged With: basics, FAQ, onsemiconductor

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Power factor correction topologies - Power Electronic Tips says:
    November 17, 2021 at 5:01 am

    […] the rise of green energy and transportation technologies, power factor correction (PFC) is growing in importance. PFC is an integral aspect of green energy designs since it can […]

Primary Sidebar

Featured Contributions

Robust design for Variable Frequency Drives and starters

Meeting demand for hidden wearables via Schottky rectifiers

The case for vehicle 48 V power systems

GaN reliability milestones break through the silicon ceiling

Developing power architecture to support autonomous transportation

More Featured Contributions

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: 5G Technology
This Tech Toolbox covers the basics of 5G technology plus a story about how engineers designed and built a prototype DSL router mostly from old cellphone parts. Download this first 5G/wired/wireless communications Tech Toolbox to learn more!

EE ENGINEERING TRAINING DAYS

engineering
“power
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.
“bills

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Diode recovery test Irrm timing.
  • Battery Deep Discharge – IC Workarounds?
  • The Analog Gods Hate Me
  • Safe Current and Power Density Limits in PCB Copper(in A/m² and W/m³) simulation
  • Why so few Phase shift full bridge controllers?

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Wideband matching an electrically short bowtie antenna; 50 ohm, 434 MHz
  • The Analog Gods Hate Me
  • Simple LED Analog Clock Idea
  • PIC KIT 3 not able to program dsPIC
  • Parts required for a personal project

DesignFast

Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • 5G Technology World
  • EE World Online
  • Engineers Garage
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • EV Engineering
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy