• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • Battery Management
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Transformers
    • Transistors
  • Applications
    • 5G
    • AI
    • Automotive
    • EV Engineering
    • LED Lighting
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Wireless
  • Learn
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQ
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars & Digital Events
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • White Papers
    • Design Fast
  • Video
    • EE Videos & Interviews
    • Teardown Videos
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • Engineeering Training Days
  • Newsetter Subscription

Talk of EV fires still smolders

September 29, 2021 By Lee Teschler

Leland Teschler • Executive Editor
lteschler@wtwhmedia.com
On Twitter @ DW_LeeTeschler

The latest figures from the National Fire Protection Association show that only about 20% of all vehicle fires arise from problems in the vehicle electrical system—most fires have something to do with the fuel system. Seeing as electric vehicles will do away with problematic petrol, you might wonder whether a fleet composed mainly of EVs will experience fewer vehicle fires, despite recent headlines about five Chevy Volts igniting without any external cause.

Of course, here’s the rub: Car fires documented by the NFPA started in electrical systems powered by one or Lee-Teschlertwo 12-V lead-acid batteries. In contrast, EVs carry behemoth 400 to 800-V battery packs spread out over the space beneath the passenger compartment. The issue is whether EV designers can balance safe operation with realities of charging, cost, and battery life.

You get a feeling for some of these tradeoffs from remarks made at the recent Battery Show in the Detroit area. There representatives from EV pickup maker Atlis Motor Vehicles, infrastructure engineering firm Black & Veatch, EV motorcycle maker Damon Motors, and battery maker Romeo Power sat on a panel that outlined a few of the obstacles to progress in battery technology.

Some of their comments pertained specifically to thermal runaway conditions in batteries which, obviously, can lead to outcomes involving fire departments. There is a lot of work underway in what’s called passive thermal propagation in battery packs. Basically, this refers to the heat generated during single-cell failures within high-energy batteries. The heat can force adjacent cells into thermal runaway, creating a cascading propagation through the whole battery.

One approach that can slow these potentially catastrophic effects is the use of passive mitigation strategies. Examples include putting 5-mm gaps between select rows and columns in the array of battery cells and inserting physical barriers such as ceramic fiber board into the gaps. Problem is, adding gaps and barriers makes the battery bigger and less energy dense. That’s definitely not the direction battery suppliers and automakers want to go, given the demand for ordinary EVs able to travel 600 miles before needing a recharge.

The tradeoff between energy density and thermal runaway problems also explains another trend: The steady growth in battery energy density seen over the past few years is starting to flatten out, panelists said. Thus EV batteries are still improving, but the improvements are taking longer to reach consumers.

Nevertheless, the companies making batteries and sophisticated EVs seem to believe that the problems presented by thermal issues and higher energy densities are solvable. Today, the cost of manufacturing EV battery cells is below $100/kWh. Panelists think within five years it will be less than $50/kWh.

But they also think the battery industry will have to change to get prices this low. For one thing, battery manufacturing processes are still too expensive. Panelists say gross profit margins for battery manufacturers–which tend to be in the 10–20% range today–will have to come down to perhaps 8%, the average margin enjoyed by a clothing retailer. Additionally, future batteries must move away from using conflict materials, natural resources extracted in conflict zones and sold to fiancé the fighting.

If it all comes true, you probably won’t have to worry about packing a fire extinguisher in the back seat of your EV.

You may also like:

  • charging
    Say goodbye to cross-country road trips
  • battery breakthrough fatigue
    Battery breakthrough fatigue
  • By Ashley Felton - Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1566902
    Why your local landfill won’t contain lithium batteries
  • safety first
    How to electrocute yourself in a few easy steps
  • PoE
    Halt and catch fire: The perils of cheap PoE

Filed Under: Automotive, batteries, Editor's Blog, EV Engineering, Featured, Industry Experts

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. William K. says

    October 15, 2021 at 1:02 pm

    So far the fires seem to be caused either by mechanical damage or they seem to stem from dendrite growth causing short circuits. Protection against mechanical damage is all in the packaging engineering realm, and dendrites might be eliminated if the solid electrolyte battery makes it into production. We read press releases every week telling us about breakthroughs, but then what becomes of the discovery?
    Certainly the deign of the battery package is a compromise between energy density and heat removal, with the solutions to each being in the opposite directions. So there is still a lot of room for progress.
    But with inflation heading the way it is, and the green activists demanding shutdowns of generating capacity, there may not be power available to even charge those EVs.

Primary Sidebar

Featured Contributions

Meeting demand for hidden wearables via Schottky rectifiers

The case for vehicle 48 V power systems

GaN reliability milestones break through the silicon ceiling

Developing power architecture to support autonomous transportation

What makes SiC tick?

More Featured Contributions

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: Internet of Things
Explore practical strategies for minimizing attack surfaces, managing memory efficiently, and securing firmware. Download now to ensure your IoT implementations remain secure, efficient, and future-ready.

EE ENGINEERING TRAINING DAYS

engineering
“power
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.
“bills

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Battery sensing circuitry for coin cell application
  • Lightbox circuit help
  • Input impedance matching network
  • Unity Gain Buffer with 0 to 0.5V Range
  • LVS Mismatch Error in Simple Layout

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • how to make bihar airport
  • Trail camera
  • how to work on pcbs that are thick
  • can a AT89C51 be used as a rom?
  • how to use crystal

DesignFast

Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • 5G Technology World
  • EE World Online
  • Engineers Garage
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • EV Engineering
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy