• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • Battery Management
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Transformers
    • Transistors
  • Applications
    • 5G
    • AI
    • Automotive
    • EV Engineering
    • LED Lighting
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Wireless
  • Learn
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQ
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars & Digital Events
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • White Papers
    • Design Fast
  • Video
    • EE Videos & Interviews
    • Teardown Videos
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • Engineeering Training Days
  • Newsetter Subscription

What are the different single-phase transformerless PV inverter configurations?

December 4, 2024 By Rakesh Kumar

A transformerless PV inverter has no galvanic isolation between the input and the output, leading to current leakage problems. Parasitic capacitance plays a crucial role in the circulation of leakage current. Several types of transformerless PV inverter configurations can address this issue. This FAQ discusses why parasitic capacitance matters and the four commonly used configurations to overcome leakage current circulation.

Why does parasitic capacitance matter in single-phase transformerless PV inverters?

Parasitic capacitance is commonly present in all transformerless PV inverter configurations; hence, it is good to know about them before we discuss the inverter configurations further. Parasitic capacitance in photovoltaic (PV) panels is an inherent electrical characteristic that arises from the design and installation of the modules. This capacitance is not required for the primary function of the PV array but is a byproduct of its mechanical structure and installation. Figure 1 shows parasitic capacitance created by PV panel and their surrounding environment.

Figure 1. The presence of parasitic capacitance in PV panels causes leakage of current circulation. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

The following are four ways parasitic capacitance influences the transformerless PV inverter:

  1. Parasitic capacitance can lead to leakage currents, which may cause grid current distortion and electromagnetic interference.
  2. The parasitic capacitance can influence the operating behavior of inverters, especially transformerless types.
  3. While parasitic capacitance does not affect the insulation of PV modules, the resulting leakage current may pose a safety risk if not properly managed.
  4. In dry conditions, the parasitic capacitance is typically small enough that its effect on PV system operation is negligible.

Now, as illustrated in Figure 2, let us examine four commonly categorized single-phase transformerless PV inverters. We will briefly discuss how each type is different and how they benefit the electrical grid.

Figure 2. Different types of single-phase transformerless PV inverter configurations and their notable features. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

Common-ground type single-phase transformerless PV inverter

The common ground-type single-phase transformerless PV inverter shown in Figure 3 is a configuration in which the negative terminal of the PV panel is directly connected to the grid’s ground line. This connection offers the advantages of constant common mode voltage (CMV) and eliminates leakage current.

By connecting the PV panel’s negative terminal directly to the grid ground, the parasitic capacitors (Cpv1 and Cpv2), the primary source of leakage current, are clamped to zero potential. This clamping prevents the formation of a resonant circuit that would otherwise be excited by varying CMV, thereby eliminating leakage current.

Figure 3. Circuit diagram of a common-ground type single-phase transformerless PV inverter configuration. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

While common ground configurations excel at suppressing leakage current, they can present challenges in controlling flying capacitors or inductors. However, the benefits of constant CMV and the elimination of leakage current make them highly desirable for transformerless PV inverters, particularly in size and efficiency.

DC-decoupled type single-phase transformerless PV inverter

DC-decoupled transformerless inverters are a full-bridge single-phase PV inverter that utilize an extra circuit at the dc bus to decouple the PV panels from the ac side during the freewheeling period. This decoupling aims to suppress leakage current. Figure 4 shows a dc-decoupled type inverter, commonly known as the H5 configuration, which has a switch at the input side of the inverter to help eliminate leakage current.

Figure 4. Circuit diagram of a dc-decoupled type single-phase transformerless PV inverter showing a switch before the input of the inverter. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

Switches S1 and S3 operate at grid frequency but are phase-shifted by 180 degrees. Like S1 and S3, switches S2 and S4 operate at switching frequencies separated by 180-degree phase angles. Therefore, the switch combination of S1, S2, S3, and S4 acts as an H-bridge inverter.

However, during the operation of any H-bridge inverter, there is a zero-voltage state during the transition between positive and negative cycles, which causes leakage of current circulation. This is the precise moment when switch S5 disconnects the grid and the PV modules to prevent leakage of current circulation.

AC-decoupled type single-phase transformerless PV inverter

Instead of acting on the DC side, AC-decoupled configurations introduce a decoupling circuit on the AC side, specifically at the AC output port. This approach offers alternative paths during freewheeling, reducing leakage current. Another advantage of this approach is that these configurations achieve low total harmonic distortion (THD) in the output voltage and current. Figure 5 shows the AC-decoupled type inverter with a pair of switches at the AC output port.

Figure 5. Circuit diagram of an ac-decoupled type single-phase transformerless PV inverter showing a switch-pair after the output of the inverter. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

During the freewheeling period, when the inverter output voltage is zero, the inductive current from the grid needs a path to flow. The ac-decoupling circuit provides this alternative path, allowing the inductive current to circulate without flowing back through the PV panel’s parasitic capacitances (CPV1 and CPV2). By diverting the current away from the parasitic capacitances, ac decoupling minimizes the potential difference across them, thereby suppressing the generation of leakage current.

Neutral point clamped (NPC) Type single-phase transformerless PV inverter

As discussed in our previous conversations, leakage current arises in transformerless inverters due to the absence of galvanic isolation and parasitic capacitances (Cpv1 and Cpv2) between the PV panel and ground.

NPC configurations achieve CMV clamping by introducing additional components, typically capacitors, and diodes, to create a virtual neutral point within the inverter circuit, as shown in Figure 6. This virtual neutral point is a reference for voltage levels, limiting CMV fluctuations and reducing leakage current.

Figure 6. Circuit diagram of an NPC-type single-phase transformerless PV inverter showing a connection tapped at the capacitor center at the inverter input. (Image: Rakesh Kumar, Ph.D.)

NPC configurations can achieve lower THD in the output current than other transformerless inverter types, leading to better power quality. The values of clamping capacitors in NPC circuits influence the effectiveness of CMV clamping and the ripple in the clamped voltage. Careful selection is essential to optimize performance.

Summary

We discussed four types of transformerless PV inverter configurations. The common ground type configuration is the simplest, using fewer semiconductors and a small filter with very high efficiency. However, using a flying capacitor or inductor could present control difficulties.

The dc-decoupled and ac-decoupled configurations isolate the dc and ac part of the inverter to prevent leakage current circulation. However, both the inverter configurations are bigger than the common-ground configuration. The NPC configuration has a special feature called constant CMV. Still, the inverter size is larger than the dc-coupled and ac-coupled configurations, and the efficiency is lower than that of the common ground configuration.

References

A Comparative Review on Single Phase Transformerless Inverter Topologies for Grid-connected Photovoltaic Systems, MDPI
Energy efficiency enhancement in full-bridge PV inverters with advanced modulations, ScienceDirect
Transformerless Inverter Topologies for Single-Phase Photovoltaic Systems, Aalborg University
Capacitive Leakage Currents, SMA Solar Technology
Leading Leakage Currents, SMA Solar Technology

Related EE World content

How multilevel converters and SiC can improve sustainability
Switched capacitor power conversion for electronic systems
Trends in photovoltaic energy conversion
Inverters for green energy systems

You may also like:


  • Selection and implementation of BLDC control strategy

  • What are bidirectional GaN power ICs good for?

  • Hardware, software bundle boosts BLDC motor efficiency

  • How is AI being used to improve electric vehicle efficiency?

Filed Under: ac power sources/frequency converters, AC-DC, FAQ, Featured, power modules Tagged With: FAQ

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. jgo64 says

    December 27, 2024 at 6:23 am

    Hi, Correct me if I am wrong but capacitors are open circuits in DC ? So I am a little puzzled by your topologies drawings… I just have had a look at Aalborg referenced document and in it parasitics capacitors are connected from the PV frames to ground and the PV DC is connected to the inverter, aren’t they ? Best regards, J

Primary Sidebar

Featured Contributions

Meeting demand for hidden wearables via Schottky rectifiers

The case for vehicle 48 V power systems

GaN reliability milestones break through the silicon ceiling

Developing power architecture to support autonomous transportation

What makes SiC tick?

More Featured Contributions

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: Internet of Things
Explore practical strategies for minimizing attack surfaces, managing memory efficiently, and securing firmware. Download now to ensure your IoT implementations remain secure, efficient, and future-ready.

EE ENGINEERING TRAINING DAYS

engineering
“power
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.
“bills

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • RF-DC rectifier impedance matching
  • Lightbox circuit help
  • Battery sensing circuitry for coin cell application
  • Replacement of the rectifier diode with a MOSFET transistor?
  • differential amplifier with active load

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Telegram Based Alarm - Sensor cable protection
  • using a RTC in SF basic
  • 100uF bypass Caps?
  • Lightbox circuit
  • how to work on pcbs that are thick

DesignFast

Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • 5G Technology World
  • EE World Online
  • Engineers Garage
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • EV Engineering
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy