• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • Battery Management
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Transformers
    • Transistors
  • Applications
    • 5G
    • AI
    • Automotive
    • EV Engineering
    • LED Lighting
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Wireless
  • Learn
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQ
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars & Digital Events
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • White Papers
  • Video
    • EE Videos & Interviews
    • Teardown Videos
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • Engineeering Training Days
  • Newsetter Subscription

Top power electronics threads on EDAboard.com – August

September 1, 2015 By Aimee Kalnoskas Leave a Comment

edalogoPhase shift full-bridge SMPS is massively over-hyped? – The Phase Shift Full Bridge (PSFB) converter is a hoax. The LTspice simulation (Editor’s note: see post for file) of a “plain” full-bridge SMPS bears this out. PSFB claims to be able to reduce switching losses compared to the “plain” full-bridge SMPS. However, the PSFB does have turn-OFF switching losses, just as does the “plain” full-bridge SMPS…so “no cigar” there for the PSFB. The PSFB does have zero turn-ON switching losses, but the “plain” full-bridge SMPS has very minimal switching losses anyway.

The only turn-ON switching loss of a “plain” full-bridge SMPS is that associated with the 1/2CV^2 loss due to the discharge of the FET’s Drain-source capacitance at turn-ON. But this is a small switching loss. The “plain” full-bridge SMPS has no “overlap” of FET voltage and current at turn-ON because the leakage inductance of the full-bridge transformer prevents the current from rising up quickly enough to do that. The downer for the PSFB is the large amount of circulating current in the primary of the PSFB transformer, this causes more conduction losses than the “plain” full-bridgeSMPS…so definitely “no cigar” for the PSFB here. The PSFB is simply a waste of time, its advantages are too insignificant to make it worth the extra expense. PSFB’s don’t even manage to get zero turn-ON switching losses when lightly loaded. Waste of money…do you agree? Read more

Current sense transformers on ETD type bobbins? – Would you agree that it is too risky to get SMPS current sense transformers wound onto ETD type bobbins? After all, if the winders forget to actually cross the primary wire back over itself then the primary may have zero coupling with the secondary, as the image below shows. As you know, this can’t happen with toroid cores since the winding is taken through the centre of the toroid, and therefore, there is always a completed turn of primary coupling up with the secondary. So do you agree that its best not to wind current sense transformers on ETD type bobbins? Read moretop threads power 8 31

LM7912 regulator output is setting down to zero – LM7912 regulator output is setting down to zero after the current is drawn by the load. My project is the sensor from the field will give 8 to 48 mA outputwhich is read by the ADC. After that, it will be taken to the microcontroller, it will be sent to DAC, and the output of the DAC is 4 -20 mA. Whenever the unit is switched on for some time, the output of the DAC is going 45mA which is out of our scaling. There is no linearity between input mAmps and output mAmps. Whenever the output of DAC is 45mA , the output of the 7912 regulator is 0V. Please let me know if this is because of regulator or some other component. Read more

Gapping a ferrite core for full bridge SMPS transformer? – We are designing a 1.7kW Full Bridge SMPS transformer using a PM62/49 core by Epcos TDK (N87 material). We don’t want a gap in the core, but I believe we will have to have one because otherwise the change in the “saturation current” level {I(SAT)} varies too much as temperature changes. We need to know exactly what is our saturation current, and we simply cannot tolerate this level of variation in the saturation current level. If we work to the lowest level of saturation current, then we would in any case end up with a too big a core, as we would need to increase the core size. Therefore, we will add a gap to the centre leg of the core…(just 0.2mm)….this means that the ue value will not vary over temperature, as is seen in Epcos graph below. Do you agree we need the gap? Read more
top threads power 8 31 c
Is this the only way to get bidirectional, isolated SMPS with step-up and down? –  We need to do a (small as possible) 2kW SMPS car battery charger which is bi-directional so that it can also put the battery energy back into the mains. Do you think the attached is a way to do it? If so, can you state if the needed “changeover switch” exists anywhere? Preferably the changeover switch could be electronically controlled, and could switch between circuits whilst preserving their mains isolation from each other. Read more
top threads power d

 

MOSFET ringing at switch ON step – When I switch the IRFP640 N Mosfet ON, I get some ringing. My guess is that this is due to the Miller effect. How can I avoid it? Read more

Half bridge LLCs vs full-bridge LLC converter? – Supposing that one has a wide output voltage range, then is it better to use a full-bridge LLC converter than a half-bridge LLC converter? I say this because the Q is lower for a given load when a full bridge LLC is used. And that surely means that the full bridge LLC can manage a wider output voltage range? Our spec is…
vin = 390VDC
Vout = 250 – 420VDC
Pout = 3kW
Read more

LF transformer as a PFC inductor – I need a quick set-up for a battery charger. I’m going to use a gas generator, a welder transformer, and a bridge rectifier. I’ve used it before but it was a real pain for the gas generator (not using any PFC circuit at all). I’ve read somewhere  about using a(nother) regular LF transformer as a passive PFC inductor. They put the primary winding of the “PFC” transformer in series with the secondary winding of the main transformer (after bridge rectifier). And here comes the twilight part: If I remember correctly, the secondary winding of the “PFC” transformer has been shunted. Is that correct? Or should I left it open circuit? Read more

Triac PCB trace width & current – I’m creating a PCB for a digital switch circuit using Triac as a solid state relay.
Top threads power 8 31 e
The circuit is using BTA24-600B Triac and MOC3021 Optocoupler. The circuit will drive high loads as the Triac can drive up to 24 Amp current. I’m on the PCB design phase I need some expert person to help me on the following please:

  1. I have used online Trace calculators to know the suitable trace width that can carry 24 amperes. I need to know does this current will pass only through the Triac Terminals 1 and 2 to the load? i.e. the red wires in the above drawing only? Should any other black wire carry high current other than the red ones? I have read the datasheet for the Triac but couldn’t understand this info.
  2. Is there any distance requirement between high current traces on PCB? I have seen trace width calculators but do not know is there any minimum trace spacing requirement?

Read more

Filed Under: AC-DC, Battery, Battery Management, DC-DC, MOSFETS, Power Management, Power Supplies, Transformers Tagged With: edaboard.com

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Featured Contributions

Protecting Ethernet interfaces in telecommunications applications against common high energy surges

Ionic cooling: a silent revolution in thermal management

Robust design for Variable Frequency Drives and starters

Meeting demand for hidden wearables via Schottky rectifiers

The case for vehicle 48 V power systems

More Featured Contributions

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: Test & Measurement
We’ve gathered articles that include hands-on product tryouts and reviews. Indeed, every article in this issue uses an oscilloscope in one way or another so you might just call this “The Oscilloscope Tech Toolbox.”

EE ENGINEERING TRAINING DAYS

engineering
“power
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.
“bills

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • I am ready to move from electrical and electronics field but confused where ?
  • Hitachi SuperScan Elite 802 CRT Monitor Issues (Model CM802U)
  • Funny Images Thread!
  • replacing an absolete component of converter
  • UPS for elevator

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • 5G Technology World
  • EE World Online
  • Engineers Garage
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • EV Engineering
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy