• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Power Electronic Tips

Power Electronic News, Editorial, Video and Resources

  • Products
    • Power Supplies
    • AC-DC
    • DC-DC
    • MOSFETS
    • Power Management
    • Battery Management
    • RF Power
    • Resistors
    • Capacitors
    • Magnetics
    • Transformers
  • Applications
    • LED Lighting
    • Rack Mount
    • Wireless
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • EE Learning Center
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
  • Video
    • EE Videos
    • TI Power Videos
    • Teardown Videos
  • Resources
    • Design Fast
    • eBooks / Tech Tips
    • FAQ
    • LEAP Awards
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • White Papers

Battery breakthrough fatigue

February 4, 2021 By Lee Teschler 2 Comments

Leland Teschler • Executive Editor

For some cheap thrills, try Googling the words “battery breakthrough.” You’ll be presented with page after page of articles breathlessly chronicling one research result after another in energy storage. But you might wonder why, with so many earth-shattering developments, electric vehicles can’t travel 1,000 miles before needing a recharge.

The reason: It doesn’t take much to be a breakthrough in batteries these days, at least not in the eyes Lee-Teschlerof journalists. We did a quick review of the top “battery breakthrough” search results to figure out why EVs in our neighborhood are forced to charge up every night. What we found was that a lot of the work reported in excited tones is over hyped. The typical “battery breakthrough” isn’t a battery at all. It more likely takes the form of goop in a flask sitting on a lab bench somewhere.

That said, researchers quoted in write-ups of their work tend to be more measured and circumspect about what they’ve achieved. Unlike the gushing of reporters, individual researchers are more likely to characterize their accomplishments as building blocks or promising strides on what’s likely to be a long road to commercialization.

For example, consider the “breakthrough” at Nanotech Energy, a startup that hopes to produce a battery charging “18 times faster than anything currently on the market” within the year. Perhaps, but all it has made so far are graphene inks.

Then there are the electrolytes coming out of the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab that suppress dendrite growth on battery anodes before it can cause the battery to fail. The electrolyte is flexible enough to be a laminate between the anode and the battery separator on rolls of lithium foils–someday. But that’s all down the road a bit.

Also in this category is Sila Nanotechnologies. It has come up with a “nanocomposite” of silicon and other materials to replace the graphite in electrodes. The company says its product will boost battery capacities by 20 to 40%. But Sila doesn’t actually make batteries. It hopes to get its technology into the hands of companies that do, in fact, make batteries in the next year.

A similar development comes from scientists at Washington State University. Researchers there were able to prevent dendrites from forming on electrodes—and eventually shorting out the battery—by adding a few key chemicals to the cathode and electrolyte to form a protective layer on the surface of a lithium-metal anode. The team figures the process can be integrated into existing manufacturing procedures. But no word yet of any battery maker actually doing so.

Reading between the lines, many advances touted as breakthroughs sound like maybe-somebody-can-use-this developments. A minority involve real batteries. One of the few in this category is QuantumScape. The company has released test data on its solid-electrolyte cells indicating batteries based on them could charge 80% in just 15 minutes. But the QuantumScape battery cells are just one layer of a much larger cell structure that will make up real batteries.

It remains to be seen whether QuantumScape can scale up and produce entire battery packs at industrial scale. If things go well, Volkswagen says it hopes to use the batteries in its 2024 or 2025 vehicles. So though QuantumScape is well beyond the goop-in-a-flask stage, its technology is still about five years away from commercialization.

That time frame is something to keep in mind the next time you see a headline announcing “breakthrough” battery chemistry lab work.

You may also like:

  • electrolytic caps
    Why electrolytic capacitors blow up
  • UVC in cars
    Latest connected car feature: Germicidal lights
  • safety first
    How to electrocute yourself in a few easy steps
  • traco power 450 series
    Putting the Traco Power 450 Series power supplies through their…
  • LED bulb teardown
    Teardown: Simple approach characterizes modern LED bulbs

Filed Under: batteries, Featured, Power Electronics Handbook Tagged With: Commentary

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alan Mainwaring says

    February 19, 2021 at 4:49 pm

    My local battery supplier and myself was conned by the so called breakthrough in Lead Crystal Batteries. The company that made these batteries claimed they would last ten years, had a similar charge and discharge characteristics to conventional lead acid batteries.
    It was also claimed they could be discharged down to almost zero volts. Note these batteries are not for portable use. I paid $5000 Aus for 8 x 6volt 200 amp hours after 2 years I load tested them and they only had half their capacity. I then tried to find out why and I noticed it was now hard to contact the company, I was told that I had to charge them at 2/3C which is around 120 amps. This was a total shock. My solar system at most inputs 2000W which is 50 amps max at 48V. This means for me is useless, they were hyped for Solar storage well I will keep using them but their storage capacity is pathetic.
    I have noticed we are being sold cheap lithium phosphate ion batteries in Australia and it seems impossible to check useful technical manuals on these batteries.
    Battery technology is still very disappointing even though we keep hearing about breakthrough after breakthrough. I have lost trust in many of the claims that companies make.

  2. William K. says

    February 20, 2021 at 2:49 pm

    It has been my feeling as well that we never hear any more about breakthroughs after the initial announcement. And we never hear anything about what prevented the success. That would be very interesting indeed. The product that I was involved in the developing was simply canceled because the profit was too far down the road, and it was a product that the auto companies really wanted. It was a sensor that would detect a crash much faster than the accelerometer do es in present systems. The problem that we saw as big was the sensing element, which was difficult to produce with uniform sensitivity and adequate production yield. Probably a different approach could produce it, but that was not what the leaders wanted and so no alternative approaches were investigated. A sensing element that was good and cheap would be far outside the current patent and so some other company could make a product that saved lots of lives. And make money as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

CURRENT DIGITAL ISSUE

A frequency you can count on There are few constants in life, but what few there are might include death, taxes, and a U.S. grid frequency that doesn’t vary by more than ±0.5 Hz. However, the certainty of the grid frequency is coming into question, thanks to the rising percentage of renewable energy sources that…

More from the digital archive

DesignFast

Component Selection Made Simple.

Try it Today
design fast globle

Subscribe to our Newsletter

The Power Electronic eNewsletter delivers breaking electronic and power component news, resources, product innovations and more.

Subscribe today

EE TRAINING CENTER CLASSROOMS

EE Classrooms

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • How do you find the angle made by two isosceles triangles in a kite?
  • Thermal pad construction on pcb
  • FPGA LVDS with separate clock
  • Help understanding 915MHz transciever pcb layout
  • Ansys Electronic Desktop (HFSS) file opening failed????

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Flickering (candle) LED to trigger 555
  • Identify a circuit.
  • Microcontrollable adjustable and switchable constant current source for driving LED's
  • Useful Handbook for Making Low Level Measurements
  • CRYPTOOOOO, but wait i am no terrorist

Footer

EE World Online Network

  • DesignFast
  • EE World Online
  • EDA Board Forums
  • Electro Tech Online Forums
  • Connector Tips
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire and Cable Tips
  • 5G Technology World

Power Electronic Tips

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookFollow us on YouTube Follow us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy